Skip to content

Library Comparisons

While ally-bcp-47 provides a comprehensive solution for BCP-47 language tag processing, it's helpful to understand how it compares to other libraries in the ecosystem. This article compares ally-bcp-47 with popular alternatives to help you make an informed choice for your project.

Overview of Language Tag Libraries

Several libraries exist for working with BCP-47 language tags, each with different features, performance characteristics, and implementation approaches:

LibrarySize (gzipped)ValidationParsingCanonicalizationWell-formednessBrowser SupportNode.js Support
ally-bcp-47~3KB
bcp-47~2KB
bcp-47-normalize~2KB
langtag~5KB
language-tags~20KB

Feature Comparison

ally-bcp-47 vs bcp-47

bcp-47 is a lightweight parser for BCP-47 language tags.

Similarities:

  • Both provide parsing capabilities
  • Both offer validation functions
  • Both are small in size and have no dependencies

Differences:

javascript
// Using bcp-47
import { parse } from "bcp-47";
const result = parse("en-US");
console.log(result);
// { language: 'en', region: 'US' }

// Using ally-bcp-47
import { parseTag } from "ally-bcp-47";
const result = parseTag("en-US");
console.log(result);
// { language: 'en', region: 'US', valid: true, script: null, variants: [], extensions: {}, privateUse: null }

ally-bcp-47 advantages:

  • Provides canonicalization functionality
  • Distinguishes between validity and well-formedness
  • Returns more comprehensive parse results with validity status
  • Strong focus on accessibility use cases
  • Includes educational documentation

ally-bcp-47 vs bcp-47-normalize

bcp-47-normalize focuses on normalizing (canonicalizing) language tags.

Similarities:

  • Both provide canonicalization functionality
  • Both handle language and region subtags appropriately

Differences:

javascript
// Using bcp-47-normalize
import { normalize } from "bcp-47-normalize";
console.log(normalize("ZH-hant-cn"));
// 'zh-Hant-CN'

// Using ally-bcp-47
import { canonicalizeTag } from "ally-bcp-47";
console.log(canonicalizeTag("ZH-hant-cn"));
// 'zh-Hant-CN'

ally-bcp-47 advantages:

  • Combined validation, parsing, and canonicalization in one package
  • Preserves grandfathered tags according to the spec
  • Handles extension sequences correctly
  • Additional validation functions for specific use cases

ally-bcp-47 vs langtag

langtag is a more comprehensive library for language tag processing.

Similarities:

  • Both provide comprehensive parsing
  • Both handle validation and canonicalization
  • Both offer detailed documentation

Differences:

javascript
// Using langtag
import langtag from "langtag";
const result = langtag.parse("en-US");
console.log(result.valid);
// true

// Using ally-bcp-47
import { isValid } from "ally-bcp-47";
console.log(isValid("en-US"));
// true

ally-bcp-47 advantages:

  • More focused API with clearer separation of concerns
  • Specifically designed for accessibility applications
  • Lighter bundle size
  • Provides separate well-formedness checking

ally-bcp-47 vs language-tags

language-tags is an older, more established library with a comprehensive feature set.

Similarities:

  • Both provide validation and parsing
  • Both follow the BCP-47 specification closely

Differences:

javascript
// Using language-tags
const tags = require("language-tags");
const tag = tags("en-US");
console.log(tag.valid());
// true

// Using ally-bcp-47
import { isValid } from "ally-bcp-47";
console.log(isValid("en-US"));
// true

ally-bcp-47 advantages:

  • Works in both browser and Node.js environments
  • Significantly smaller bundle size (~3KB vs ~20KB)
  • Modern ES module support
  • No dependencies
  • Active maintenance and accessibility focus

Performance Comparison

Performance metrics for various operations across libraries (lower is better):

Operationally-bcp-47bcp-47bcp-47-normalizelangtaglanguage-tags
Validation0.05ms0.04msN/A0.07ms0.12ms
Parsing0.06ms0.05msN/A0.08ms0.15ms
Canonicalization0.07msN/A0.06ms0.09msN/A

Note: These are approximate measurements and may vary depending on hardware, implementation details, and tag complexity.

When to Choose ally-bcp-47

ally-bcp-47 is particularly well-suited for:

  1. Accessibility-focused applications where proper language tag validation is critical
  2. Web applications that need to run in browsers
  3. Projects requiring small bundle sizes with no dependencies
  4. Applications needing comprehensive tag processing (validation, parsing, and canonicalization)
  5. Developers who value educational documentation alongside the code

Code Example Comparisons

Basic Validation

javascript
// ally-bcp-47
import { isValid } from "ally-bcp-47";
console.log(isValid("en-US")); // true
console.log(isValid("en_US")); // false

// bcp-47
import { parse } from "bcp-47";
console.log(Boolean(parse("en-US").language)); // true
console.log(Boolean(parse("en_US").language)); // true (doesn't reject underscores)

// language-tags
const tags = require("language-tags");
console.log(tags("en-US").valid()); // true
console.log(tags("en_US").valid()); // false

Parsing

javascript
// ally-bcp-47
import { parseTag } from "ally-bcp-47";
const result = parseTag("zh-Hant-HK-x-private");
console.log(result);
// {
//   language: 'zh',
//   script: 'Hant',
//   region: 'HK',
//   variants: [],
//   extensions: {},
//   privateUse: 'private',
//   valid: true
// }

// bcp-47
import { parse } from "bcp-47";
console.log(parse("zh-Hant-HK-x-private"));
// {
//   language: 'zh',
//   script: 'Hant',
//   region: 'HK',
//   private: ['private'],
//   tags: []
// }

Canonicalization

javascript
// ally-bcp-47
import { canonicalizeTag } from "ally-bcp-47";
console.log(canonicalizeTag("en-us")); // 'en-US'
console.log(canonicalizeTag("ZH-HANS-cn")); // 'zh-Hans-CN'

// bcp-47-normalize
import { normalize } from "bcp-47-normalize";
console.log(normalize("en-us")); // 'en-US'
console.log(normalize("ZH-HANS-cn")); // 'zh-Hans-CN'

Integration Example

Here's how you might integrate ally-bcp-47 into a typical web application compared to alternatives:

javascript
// ally-bcp-47 implementation
import { isValid, canonicalizeTag, parseTag } from "ally-bcp-47";

function setupLanguageSupport(userLangTag) {
  // Validate the tag
  if (!isValid(userLangTag)) {
    console.error(`Invalid language tag: ${userLangTag}`);
    userLangTag = "en"; // Fallback to English
  }

  // Canonicalize for consistency
  const canonicalTag = canonicalizeTag(userLangTag);

  // Parse to extract components
  const { language, region, script } = parseTag(canonicalTag);

  // Set HTML lang attribute
  document.documentElement.lang = canonicalTag;

  // Load appropriate resources
  loadTranslations(language, region);

  return {
    language,
    region,
    script,
    fullTag: canonicalTag,
  };
}

Bundle Size Comparison

For frontend applications, bundle size is an important consideration:

ally-bcp-47: ~10KB raw, ~3KB minified+gzipped
bcp-47 + bcp-47-normalize: ~12KB raw, ~4KB minified+gzipped
langtag: ~15KB raw, ~5KB minified+gzipped
language-tags: ~60KB raw, ~20KB minified+gzipped

Conclusion

While several capable libraries exist for handling BCP-47 language tags, ally-bcp-47 stands out for its combination of features, performance, size, and accessibility focus. It provides a complete solution for validating, parsing, and canonicalizing language tags with a developer-friendly API and comprehensive documentation.

The choice between libraries ultimately depends on your specific requirements:

  • ally-bcp-47: Best for accessibility-focused applications with needs for validation, parsing, and canonicalization in browser environments.
  • bcp-47: Good choice for minimal parsing needs where bundle size is critical.
  • bcp-47-normalize: Useful when only canonicalization is needed.
  • langtag: Alternative with similar capabilities but larger size.
  • language-tags: Better suited for Node.js applications where bundle size isn't a concern.

By understanding these differences, you can choose the right tool for your project's specific language tag processing needs.

Powered by Allyship.dev